Mother In Law Suite For Rent Dallas Texas, Articles V

Hopefully, one of the above solutions help you fix Ventoy if its not working, or youre experiencing booting issues. Ventoy can boot any wim file and inject any user code into it. I think it's OK. we have no ability to boot it unless we disable the secure boot because it is not signed. Boots, but unable to find its own files; specifically, does not find boot device and waits user input to find its root device. Extra Ventoy hotkey features: F1 or 1 - load the payoad file into memory first (useful for some small DOS and Linx ISOs). Thank you very much for adding new ISOs and features. On one of my Laptop Problem with HBCD_PE_x64.iso Uefi on start from Desktop error with Autoit v3: Pintool.exe Application error. I can 3 options and option 3 is the default. But Ventoy currently does. las particiones seran gpt, modo bios I think it's OK. I downloaded filename Win10_21H2_BrazilianPortuguese_x64.iso However, Ventoy can be affected by anti-virus software and protection programs. In Ventoy I had enabled Secure Boot and GPT. Seriously? 1.0.84 AA64 www.ventoy.net ===> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. You can grab latest ISO files here : But unless it exploits a Secure Boot vulnerability or limitation (or you get cozy with the folks controlling shim keys), that bootloader should require to be enrolled to pass Secure Boot validation, in the same manner as Ventoy does it. It looks cool. 4 Ways to Fix Ventoy if It's Not Working [Booting Issues] It looks like that version https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33 fixes issue with my thinkpad. ", https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view And unfortunately, because Ventoy is derived from GRUB 2.0, the only way it could run in a Secure Boot environment (without using MokManager) is if it is loaded through a SHIM. Is there any progress about secure boot support? 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. Remove the Windows 7 installation CD/DVD from the disc tray, type exit in Command Prompt and press Enter. Option 2: Only boot .efi file with valid signature. @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? Ventoy will search all the directories and sub directories recursively to find all the iso files and list them in the boot menu. Ventoy also supports BIOS Legacy. A least, I'd expect that a tutorial that advises a user to modify a JSON file to have done a bit more research into the topic and provide better advice. Aporteus which is Arch Linux based version of Porteus , is best , fastest and greatest distro i ever met , it's fully modular , supports bleeding edge techs like zstd , have a tool to very easily compile and use latest version of released or RC kernel directly from kernel.org ( Kernel Builder ) , have a tool to generate daily fresh ISO so all the packages are daily and fresh ( Aporteus ISO Builder ) , you can have multi desktops on a ISO and on boot select whatever you like , it has naturally Copy to RAM feature with flag to copy specific modules only so linux run at huge speed , a lot of tools and softwares along side mini size ISO , and it use very very low ram and ISO size, You can generate ISO with whatever language you like to distro have. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. When it asks Delete the key (s), select Yes. The user has Ubuntu, Fedora and OpenSUSE ISOs which they want to load. Yes, anybody can make a UEFI bootloader that chain loads unsigned bootloaders with the express purpose of defeating Secure Boot. Ventoy is an open source tool to create a bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. And of course, people expect that if they run UEFIinSecureBoot or similar software, whose goal is explicitly stated as such, it will effectively remove Secure Boot. But this time I get The firmware encountered an unexpected exception. It was actually quite the struggle to get to that stage (expensive too!) and leave it up to the user. 2. Sorry for my ignorance. After install, the 1st larger partition is empty, and no files or directories in it. *far hugh* -> Covid-19 *bg*. Again, it doesn't matter whether you believe it makes sense to have Secure Boot enabled or not. and windows password recovery BootCD 2. . If the ISO file name is too long to displayed completely. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. Ventoy can detect GRUB inside ISO file, parse its configuration file and load its boot elements directly, with "linux" GRUB kernel loading command. its existence because of the context of the error message. da1: quirks=0x2. In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI." UEFI64 Bootfile \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi is present. Is there a way to force Ventoy to boot in Legacy mode? About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE, Ventoy2Disk.exe can't enumerate my USB device. 3. @ventoy (Haswell Processor) Tested in Memdisk and normal mode with 1.0.08b2. I really fail to fathom how people here are disputing that if someone agrees to enroll Ventoy in a Secure Boot environment, it only means that they agree to trust the Ventoy application, and not that they grant it the right to just run whatever bootloader anybody will now be able to throw at their computer through Ventoy (which may very well be a malicious bootloader ran by someone who is not the owner of that computer but who knows or hopes that the user enrolled Ventoy). MEMZ.img is 4K and Ventoy does not list it in it's menu system. 5. MediCAT Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. By default, the ISO partition can not be mounted after boot Linux (will show device busy when you mount). EndeavourOS_Atlantis_neo-21_5.iso boots OK using UEFI64 on Ventoy and grubfm. If the secure boot is enabled in the BIOS, the following screen should be displayed when boot Ventoy at thte first time. Yeah to clarify, my problem is a little different and i should've made that more clear. Any suggestions, bugs? Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' 5. extservice First and foremost, disable legacy boot (AKA BIOS emulation). So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. Win10UEFI+GPTWin10UEFIWin7 I have the same error with EndeavorOS_Atlantis_neo_21_5.iso using ventoy 1.0.70. the EndeavorOS iso boots with no issues when on it's on usb, but not through ventoy. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. FFS I just spent hours reinstalling arch just to get this in the end archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64.iso with Ventoy 1.0.47 boots for me on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 UEFI64 boot. I'm not talking about CSM. But when I try to boot it with ventoy it does not boot and says the message "No bootfile found for UEFI". Select the images files you want to back up on the USB drive and copy them. In that case there's no difference in booting from USB or plugging in a SATA or NVMe drive with the same content as you'd put on USB (and we can debate about intrusion detection if you want). it doesn't support Bluetooth and doesn't have nvidia's proprietary drivers but it's very easy to install. They do not provide a legacy boot option if there is a fat partition with an /EFI folder on it. Copyright Windows Report 2023. That is to say, a WinPE.iso or ubuntu.iso file can be booted fine with secure boot enabled(even no need for the user to whitelist them) but it may contain a malicious application in it. Strelec WinPE) Ctrl+r for ventoy debug mode Ctrl+h or h for help m checksum a file Without complex workarounds, XP does not support being installed from USB. Ventoy doesn't load the kernel directly inside the ISO file(e.g. Results when tested on different models\types of x86 computers - amount of RAM, make/model, latest BIOS? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532. Mybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! So I think that also means Ventoy will definitely impossible to be a shim provider. Many thousands of people use Ventoy, the website has a list of tested ISOs. I also hope that the people who are adamant about never disabling Secure Boot do realize that, as it stands, the current version of Ventoy leaves them about as exposed as if Secure Boot was disabled, which of course isn't too great Thankfully, this can be fixed so that, even when using Ventoy, Secure Boot can continue to fulfill the purpose it was actually designed for. How did you get it to be listed by Ventoy? I will not release 1.1.0 until a relatively perfect secure boot solution. access with key cards) making sure that your safe does get installed there, so that it should give you an extra chance to detect ill intentioned people trying to access its content. Hi, HDClone can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode for legacy BIOS, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. That's because, if they did want to boot non Secure Boot enabled ones, they would disable Secure Boot themselves. The point of this issue is that people are under the impression that because Ventoy supports Secure Boot, they will get the same level of "security" booting Secure Boot compliant media through Ventoy as if they had booted that same media directly, which is indeed a fair expectation to have, since the whole point of boot media creation software is to have the converted media behave as close as possible as the original would. memz.mp4. The user should be notified when booting an unsigned efi file. Win10UEFI That's theoretically feasible but is clearly banned by the shim/MS. 1.0.80 actually prompts you every time, so that's how I found it. I've been trying to do something I've done a milliion times before: This has always worked for me. my pleasure and gladly happen :) New version of Rescuezilla (2.4) not working properly. Therefore, Ventoy/Grub should be altered as follows: Hopefully this shouldn't be too complex to add, though it may require some research, and modifying GRUB to do just that might require a lot of work. Error message: the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? You can install Ventoy to USB drive, Removable HD, SD Card, SATA HDD, SSD, NVMe . ^^ maybe a lenovo / thinkpad / thinkcentre issue ? Yes, I already understood my mistake. eficompress infile outfile. The best workaround is to install some Linux variant (I use Fedora but Ubuntu and SUSE are supported) and install VirtualBox. Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. And I will posit that if someone sees it differently, or tries to justify the current behaviour of Ventoy, of letting any untrusted bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled, they don't understand trust chains, whereas this is pretty much the base of any computer security these days. Reply. You answer my questions and then I will answer yours MEMZ.img was listed with no changes for me. I am getting the same error, and I confirmed that the iso has UEFI support. Option 3: only run .efi file with valid signature. /s. This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. 8 Mb. If I wasn't aware that Ventoy uses SUISBD, I would be confused just as you by its Secure Boot "support" and lack of information about its consequences. When enrolling Ventoy, they do not. Which brings us nicely to what this is all about: Mitigation. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. It should be the default of Ventoy, which is the point of this issue. Please refer: About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE. Installation & Boot. You can put the iso file any where of the first partition. Inspection of the filesystem within the iso image shows the boot file(s) - including the UEFI bootfile - in the respective directory. Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. if the, When the user is away, clone the encrypted disk and replace their existing CPU with the slightly altered model (after making sure to clone the CPU serial). Haven't tried installing it on bare metal, but it does install to a VM with the LabConfig bypasses. However what currently happens is that people who do have Secure Boot enabled will currently not be alerted to these at all. Option 1: doesn't support secure boot at all Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. GRUB2, from my experiences does this automatically. But i have added ISO file by Rufus. What matters is what users perceive and expect. It's a pain in the ass to do yes, but I wouldn't qualify it as very hard. Well occasionally send you account related emails. Will these functions in Ventoy be disabled if Secure Boot is detected? ", same error during creating windows 7 When ventoy detects this file, it will not search the directory and all the subdirectories for iso files. It seems the original USB drive was bad after all. Ventoy is a tool to create bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. Ventoy Binary Notes: This website is underprovisioned, so please download ventoy in the follows: (remember to check the SHA-256 hash) https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases Source Code Ventoy's source code is maintained on both Github and Gitee. Ubuntu.iso). Just some preliminary ideas. As I understand, you only tested via UEFI, right? But, even as I don't actually support the idea that Secure Boot is useless if someone has physical access to the device (that was mostly Steve positing this as a means to justify that not being able to detect Secure Boot breaches on USB media isn't that big a deal), I do believe there currently still exist a bit too many ways to ensure that you can compromise a machine, if you have access to said machine. Tested on ASUS K40IN Windows 7 32-bit does not support UEFI32 - you must use Win7 64-bit.. You may need to disable Secure Boot in your BIOS settings first (or convert the ISO to a .imgPTN23 file using the MPI Tool Kit). By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and VMware or VirtualBox) This means current is UEFI mode. The idea that Ventoy users "should know what they are getting into" or that "it's pointless to check UEFI bootloaders for Secure Boot" once Ventoy has been enrolled is disingenuous at best. So any method that allows users to boot their media without having to explicitly disable Secure Boot can be seen as a nice thing to have even if it comes at the price of reducing the overall security of one's computer. Ventoy supports ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files using an exFAT filesystem. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and And we've already been over whether USB should be treated differently than internal SATA or NVMe (which, in your opinion it should, and which in mine, and I will assert the majority of people who enable Secure Boot, it shouldn't). It typically has the same name, but you can rename it to something else should you choose to do so. That error i have also with WinPE 10 Sergei is booting with that error ( on Skylake Processor). The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result, It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU, The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result Just right-click on "This PC" on the desktop, select "Manage", and click on "Disk Management . privacy statement. your point) and you also want them to actually do their designated job, including letting you know, if you have Secure Boot enabled, when some third party UEFI boot loader didn't pass Secure Boot validation, even if that boot loader will only ever be run from someone who has to have physical access to your computer in the first place. Supported / Unsupported ISOs Issue #7 ventoy/Ventoy GitHub If someone has physical access to a system and that system is enabled to boot from a USB drive, then all they need to do is boot to an OS such as Ubuntu or WindowsPE or WindowsToGo from that USB drive (these OS's are all signed and so will Secure boot). https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT Yeah, I think UEFI LoadImage()/StarImage(), which is what you'd call to chain load the UEFI bootloader, are set to validate the loaded image for Secure Boot and not launch it for unsigned/broken images, if Secure Boot is enabled (but I admit I haven't formally validated that). Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! XP predated thumbdrives big enough to hold a whole CD image, and indeed widespread use of USB thumb drives in general. You signed in with another tab or window. Time-saving software and hardware expertise that helps 200M users yearly. Have a question about this project? when the user Secure Boots via MokManager - even when booting signed efi files of Ubuntu or Windows? And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. ISO: GeckoLinux_STATIC_Plasma.x86_64-152.200719..iso (size: 1,316MB) . @rderooy try to use newest version, I've been trying on a Dell XPS 13 9360 with Ventoy 1.0.34 UEFI running and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso does not work. If someone uses Ventoy with Secure Boot, then Ventoy should not green light UEFI bootloaders that don't comply with Secure Boot. I would assert that, when Secure Boot is enabled, every single time an unsigned bootloader is loaded, a warning message should be displayed. Hi, Gentoo LiveDVD doesn't work, when I try to boot it, It's showing up the GRUB CLI https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. Acronis True Image 2020 24.6.1 Build 25700 in Legacy is working in Memdisk mode on 1.0.08 beta 2 but on another older Version of Acronis 2020 sometimes is boot's up but the most of the time he's crashing after loading acronis loader text. Option1: Use current solution(Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk), then user will be clearly told that, in this case, the secure boot will be by passed. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI. - . I tested it but trying to boot it will fail with an I/O error. There are many kinds of WinPE. While Ventoy is designed to boot in with secure boot enabled, if your computer does not support the secure boot feature, then an error will result. Edit: Disabling Secure Boot didn't help. I can only see the UEFI option in my BIOS, even thought I have CSM (Legacy Compatibility) enabled. There are many kinds of WinPE. Fedora/Ubuntu/xxx). plist file using ProperTree. P.S. However, users have reported issues with Ventoy not working properly and encountering booting issues. Where can I download MX21_February_x64.iso? Ventoy -Bootable USB [No-Root] - Apps on Google Play - Android Apps on This means current is ARM64 UEFI mode. Ventoy - Open source USB boot utility for both BIOS and UEFI The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: tails-amd64-4.5.iso Legacy tested with VM Currently when boot the ISO file failed as a Virtual CDROM, Ventoy will try to parse the grub configuration file inside the ISO file and try to boot it direclty with. Same issue with 1.0.09b1. For example, GRUB 2 is licensed under GPLv3 and will not be signed. Well, that's pretty much exactly what I suggested in points 1-4 from the original post, with point 4 altered from "an error should be returned to the user and bootx64.efi should not be launched" to "an error should be returned to the user who can then decide if they still want to launch bootx64.efi". Freebsd has some linux compatibility and also has proprietary nvidia drivers. Openbsd is based. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. bionicpup64-8.0-uefi.iso Legacy+UEFI tested with VM, ZeroShell-3.9.3-X86.iso Legacy tested with VM, slax-64bit-9.11.0.iso Legacy tested with VM. I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains accomodate this. All other distros can not be booted. You can't. Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-32-1.6.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. OpenMandrivaLx.4.0-beta.20200426.7145-minimal.x86_64.iso - 400 MB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_march_2020_x64_dvd_b193f738.iso | 5 GB Worked fine for me on my Thinkpad T420. Do I still need to display a warning message? | 5 GB, void-live-x86_64-20191109-xfce.iso | 780 MB, refracta10-beta5_xfce_amd64-20200518_0033.iso | 800 MB, devuan_beowulf_3.0.0_amd64_desktop-live.iso | 1.10 GB, drbl-live-xfce-2.6.2-1-amd64.iso | 800 MB, kali-linux-2020-W23-live-amd64.iso | 2.88 GB, blackarch-linux-live-2020.06.01-x86_64.iso | 14 GB, cucumber-linux-1.1-x86_64-basic.iso | 630 MB, BlankOn-11.0.1-desktop-amd64.iso | 1.8 GB, openmamba-livecd-en-snapshot-20200614.x86_64.iso | 1.9 GB, sol-11_3-text-x86.iso | 600 MB 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time.